Cited By
2024USA & Canada Economics – Politics – Culture, Issue 3U.S. Energy Independence: Opportunities and LimitationsO. A Khlopovhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.769
2023Environmental Research Letters: Vol. 18, Issue 2A critical review of natural gas emissions certification in the United StatesSankalp Garg, Deniz Ege Boz, Ben Gilbert, Jim Cromptonhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2572269
2022Energies: Vol. 15, Issue 14The Impact of Natural Gas, Oil, and Renewables Consumption on Carbon Dioxide Emissions: European EvidenceMatheus Belucio, Renato Santiago, José Alberto Fuinhas, Luiz Braun, José Antuneshttp://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.75577
2021Environment and Development Economics: Vol. 26, Issue 3Understanding productivity effects of hydraulic fracturing in unconventional natural gas deposits and implications for adoption in the developing worldTimothy Fitzgerald, Charles F. Masonhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es5029537
2021ChemCatChem: Vol. 13, Issue 13Unveiling the Role of Active Oxygen Species in Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Ethane with CO2 over NiFe/CeO2Man Guo, Kai Feng, Yaning Wang, Binhang Yanhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2387421
2021Sustainability: Vol. 13, Issue 12Contrasting Public and Scientific Assessments of FrackingYu Zhang, John A. Rupp, John D. Grahamhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13126650
2021Energy & Environmental Science: Vol. 14, Issue 7Techno-ecologically synergistic food–energy–water systems can meet human and ecosystem needsKyuha Lee, Sami Khanal, Bhavik R. Bakshihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.10.023
2021British Journal of Management: Vol. 32, Issue 3Imposing versus Enacting Commitments for the Long‐Term Energy Transition: Perspectives from the FirmAlain Verbeke, Thomas Hutzschenreuterhttp://dx.doi.org/10.4000/rei.5947
2020Energy: Vol. 192Modeling the coal-to-gas switch potentials in the power sector: A case study of ChinaHao Chen, Hao-Peng Geng, Hui-Ting Ling, Song Peng, Nan Li, Shiwei Yu, Yi-Ming Weihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58023-0_15
2020Comparative Education: Vol. 56, Issue 2Towards (comparative) educational research for a finite futureJeremy Rappleye, Hikaru Komatsuhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2020.1741197
2020Environmental Science and Pollution Research: Vol. 27, Issue 11The shale gas production and economic growth in local economies across the USFaik Bilgili, Emrah Koçak, Ümit Buluthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07776-7
2020Journal of Molecular Liquids: Vol. 319Interpreting micromechanics of fluid-shale interactions with geochemical modelling and disjoining pressure: Implications for calcite-rich and quartz-rich shalesLingping Zeng, Yunhu Lu, Nasser S. Al Maskari, Yongqiang Chen, Md Mofazzal Hossain, Ali Saeedi, Jeremie Dautriat, Quan Xiehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.056
2019Frontiers in Energy Research: Vol. 7South Africa After Paris—Fracking Its Way to the NDCs?Clara Luisa Orthofer, Daniel Huppmann, Volker Kreyhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137461100_8
2019Nature Sustainability: Vol. 2, Issue 12Cumulative environmental and employment impacts of the shale gas boomErin N. Mayfield, Jared L. Cohon, Nicholas Z. Muller, Inês M. L. Azevedo, Allen L. Robinsonhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3189930
2018Energy Research & Social Science: Vol. 38Snakes in The Greenhouse: Does increased natural gas use reduce carbon dioxide emissions from coal consumption?Patrick Trent Greiner, Richard York, Julius Alexander McGeehttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en10020158
2018Applied Catalysis A: General: Vol. 552Effect of cobalt loading on structure and catalytic behavior of CoO x /SiO 2 in CO 2 -assisted dehydrogenation of ethaneRajesh Koirala, Olga V. Safonova, Sotiris E. Pratsinis, Alfons Baikerhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/494307a
2018Petroleum Science and Technology: Vol. 36, Issue 20Chemical analyses of shale gas and conventional natural gasAyhan Demirbas, Nurettin Cek, Sukru Acarhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.1.3.2
2018Climate Policy: Vol. 18, Issue 4The impact of shale gas on the costs of climate policyJan Kersting, Vicki Duscha, Joachim Schleich, Kimon Keramidashttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2017.10.002
2018Progress in Energy and Combustion Science: Vol. 64The role of natural gas and its infrastructure in mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, improving regional air quality, and renewable resource integrationMichael A. Mac Kinnon, Jacob Brouwer, Scott Samuelsenhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.02.001
2018Environmental Geochemistry and Health: Vol. 40, Issue 1A review of the public health impacts of unconventional natural gas developmentP. J. Saunders, D. McCoy, R. Goldstein, A. T. Saunders, A. Munroehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137434074_9
2018Frontiers in Energy Research: Vol. 6The Impact of Information Provision on the Social Acceptance of Shale Gas Development: A Review-Based Inclusive ModelDilge G. Kânoğlu, Uğur Soytaşhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2018.00083
2018Journal of Risk Research: Vol. 21, Issue 12Global controversies in local settings: anti-fracking activism in the era of Web 2.0Agata Stasikhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2017.1313759
2018Climate Policy: Vol. 18, Issue 10Combining low-carbon economic development and oil exploration in Brazil? An energy–economy assessmentJulien Lefèvre, William Wills, Jean-Charles Hourcadehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1431198
2017Journal of Nanomechanics and Micromechanics: Vol. 7, Issue 3Microtexture Analysis of Gas Shale by XRM ImagingMija H. Hubler, Jeff Gelb, Franz-Joseph Ulmhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.4.1.cchy
2017Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy: Vol. 19, Issue 6Using integrated process and microeconomic analyses to enable effective environmental policy for shale gas in the USARasha Hasaneen, Mahmoud M. El-Halwagihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X20000534
2017Energy Procedia: Vol. 105How Shale Gas will Shape China's Future? an Evaluation Based on Dynamic Energy-CGE ModelShihui Zhang, Can Wang, Wenjia Caihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044030
2017Energies: Vol. 10, Issue 2The Impact of Shale Gas on the Cost and Feasibility of Meeting Climate Targets—A Global Energy System Model Analysis and an Exploration of UncertaintiesSheridan Few, Ajay Gambhir, Tamaryn Napp, Adam Hawkes, Stephane Mangeon, Dan Bernie, Jason Lowehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acb4af
2016Energy Policy: Vol. 98Abundant low-cost natural gas and deep GHG emissions reductions for the United StatesStephen Healey, Mark Jaccardhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0096340213478553
2016Economic Modelling: Vol. 52Long-term economic modeling for climate change assessmentY.-H. Henry Chen, Sergey Paltsev, John M. Reilly, Jennifer F. Morris, Mustafa H. Babikerhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57577-3_39
2016Energy: Vol. 116How did the US economy react to shale gas production revolution? An advanced time series approachFaik Bilgili, Emrah Koçak, Ümit Bulut, M. Nedim Sualphttp://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NM.2153-5477.0000123
2015Energy Economics: Vol. 49Boom or bust? Mapping out the known unknowns of global shale gas production potentialJérôme Hilaire, Nico Bauer, Robert J. Brechahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.03.017
2015SSRN Electronic JournalThe Economics of Shale Gas DevelopmentCharles F. Mason, Lucija Muehlenbachs, Sheila M. Olmsteadhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cctc.202100333
2015Applied Energy: Vol. 148A review of the technical and economic evaluation techniques for shale gas developmentJiehui Yuan, Dongkun Luo, Lianyong Fenghttp://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2537918
2015Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy: Vol. 4, Issue 1From Boom to Bust? A Critical Look at US Shale Gas ProjectionsPhilipp M. Richterhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.4.1.pric
2015SSRN Electronic Journal Regulatory Control of Vehicle and Power Plant Emissions: How Effective and at What Cost?Sergey Paltsev, Valerie Karplus, Y.-H. Henry Chen, Ioanna Karkatsouli, John M. Reilly, Henry D. Jacobyhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en15145263
2015Annual Review of Resource Economics: Vol. 7, Issue 1The Economics of Shale Gas DevelopmentCharles F. Mason, Lucija A. Muehlenbachs, Sheila M. Olmsteadhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10653-016-9898-x
2015Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy: Vol. 4, Issue 1Economics and Politics of Shale Gas in EuropeChi Kong Chyong, David M. Reinerhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10916466.2018.1504070
2014Revue d'économie industrielleEffets internes et externes du développement des hydrocarbures non conventionnels aux États-Unis : bilan d’étape et perspectivesPatrice Geoffron, Sophie Méritethttp://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2485083
2014Annual Review of Environment and Resources: Vol. 39, Issue 1The Environmental Costs and Benefits of FrackingRobert B. Jackson, Avner Vengosh, J. William Carey, Richard J. Davies, Thomas H. Darrah, Francis O'Sullivan, Gabrielle Pétronhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-031113-144051
2014SSRN Electronic JournalThe Economics of Shale Gas DevelopmentCharles F. Mason, Lucija Muehlenbachs, Sheila M. Olmsteadhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99837-4_10
2014Environmental Science & Technology: Vol. 48, Issue 22Emissions Implications of Future Natural Gas Production and Use in the U.S. and in the Rocky Mountain RegionJeffrey D. McLeod, Gregory L. Brinkman, Jana B. Milfordhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2027881
2014SSRN Electronic JournalMaking the Best of New Energy Resources in the United StatesDouglas Sutherlandhttp://dx.doi.org/10.31857/S2686673024030029
2014Advanced Materials Research: Vol. 962-965Assessing the Influence of Shale Gas Boom on China’s Power Sector and Environmental Policy by ModelingJing Xuan Hui, Wen Jia Cai, Can Wanghttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1302917
2014SSRN Electronic JournalFrom Boom to Bust? A Critical Look at US Shale Gas ProjectionsPhilipp M. Richterhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.040
2013Nature: Vol. 494, Issue 7437A reality check on the shale revolutionJ. David Hugheshttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2019.00020
2013Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists: Vol. 69, Issue 2Nuclear exit, the US energy mix, and carbon dioxide emissionsHenry D. Jacoby, Sergey Paltsevhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D1EE00843A
2013Geophysical Prospecting: Vol. 61, Issue s1Measurement of the normal/tangential fracture compliance ratio (ZN/ZT) during hydraulic fracture stimulation using S‐wave splitting dataJames P. Verdon, Andreas Wüstefeldhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2012.01132.x
2012Environmental Research Letters: Vol. 7, Issue 4Shale gas production: potential versus actual greenhouse gas emissionsFrancis O’Sullivan, Sergey Paltsevhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0420-1
2012Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy: Vol. 1, Issue 3Marginal Costs with Wings a Ball and Chain Pipelines and Institutional Foundations for the U.S. Gas MarketJeff D. Makholmhttp://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.962-965.1762
2012Energy & Environment: Vol. 23, Issue 6-7Is UK Energy Policy Driving Energy Innovation — Or Stifling it?Candida J Whitmillhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1260/0958-305X.23.6-7.993
2011SSRN Electronic JournalEmissions Pricing to Stabilize Global ClimateValentina Bosetti, Sergey Paltsev, John M. Reilly, Carlo Carrarohttp://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2027881
2011SSRN Electronic JournalEmissions Pricing to Stabilize Global ClimateValentina Bosetti, Sergey Paltsev, John M. Reilly, Carlo Carrarohttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66838-9_4

 

© 2024 International Association for Energy Economics | Privacy Policy | Return Policy