Template-Type: ReDIF-Article 1.0
Author-Name:  Gregory F. Nemet and Adam R. Brandt
Title:  Willingness to Pay for a Climate Backstop: Liquid Fuel Producers and Direct CO2 Air Capture
Classification-JEL: F0
Pages:  
Volume:  Volume 33
Issue:  Number 1
Year:  2012
Abstract:  We conduct a sensitivity analysis to describe conditions under which liquid fuel producers would fund the development of a climate backstop. We estimate (1) the cost to develop competitively priced direct CO2 air capture technology, a possible climate backstop and (2) the effect of this technology on the value of liquid fuel reserves by country and fuel. Under most assumptions, development costs exceed individual benefits. A particularly robust result is that carbon prices generate large benefits for conventional oil producers--making a climate backstop unappealing for them. Unilateral investment does become more likely under: stringent carbon policy, social discount rates, improved technical outcomes, and high price elasticity of demand for liquid fuels. Early stage investment is inexpensive and could provide a hedge against such developments, particularly for fuels on the margin, such as tar sands and gas-to-liquids. Since only a few entities benefit, free riding is not an important disincentive to investment, although uncertainty about who benefits probably is. 
Handle: RePEc:aen:journl:33-1-a03
File-URL: http://www.iaee.org/en/publications/ejarticle.aspx?id=2467
File-Format: text/html
File-Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to IAEE members and subscribers.